The Madras High Court recently permitted the widow of the prime accused in the murder of a prominent political leader to hold a customary observance for the first death anniversary of the accused. The political leader, a Bahujan Samaj Party figure, was attacked and killed near his residence in July 2024. The prime accused subsequently passed away in police custody in October 2025. Following his death, his family faced difficulties performing traditional funeral rites because his son had also been named as an accused and was remanded in custody.
Everything you need to know about this case, in one place.
The Madras High Court recently permitted the widow of the prime accused in the murder of a prominent political leader to hold a customary observance for the first death anniversary of the accused. The political leader, a Bahujan Samaj Party figure, was attacked and killed near his residence in July 2024. The prime accused subsequently passed away in police custody in October 2025. Following his death, his family faced difficulties performing traditional funeral rites because his son had also been named as an accused and was remanded in custody.
The widow of the accused approached the state authorities seeking police protection and permission to conduct a remembrance gathering and customary rites at their residence in Vyasarpadi. However, the police rejected the request, citing concerns over potential law and order issues and retaliatory actions. Consequently, the petitioner challenged this rejection in the Madras High Court, seeking conditional approval for the event.
Justice V. Lakshminarayanan quashed the police order denying permission and directed the Greater Chennai City Police to grant conditional approval. The court noted that despite the serious nature of the allegations against the deceased, his surviving family members retained the right to follow their customary beliefs and practices. The judge stated that the Tamil Nadu police were capable of maintaining order during the permitted three-hour gathering.
Not yet reported: The articles do not detail the ongoing criminal trial proceedings or the final cause of death determined from the visceral samples collected after the accused died in custody.
The latest position in the reports we read.
The Madras High Court quashed the police rejection order and permitted the family to hold the death anniversary observance under specific conditions, including a limit of 60 participants and a designated three-hour time window.
Described in general terms; we do not name victims.
The family of the deceased prime accused, including his widow and his son who is remanded in custody as a co-accused in the murder case.
Key dates as reported, oldest first.
Tell your local police, or dial 112 in an emergency. Please do not investigate or confront anyone yourself. You can also share a tip anonymously with us.
More cases like this one.
Optional. The full story is above; these are the original reports it was prepared from.
Prepared by Report Scams, with the help of AI, from the published reports listed above. Check those reports for the latest. Cases here describe allegations. An FIR, arrest or charge is not a finding of guilt. To report a mistake, or to ask for a correction or removal, write to our Grievance Officer. See also the Safe Posting policy.