The Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court heard a plea challenging the detention of seven members of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). The individuals were detained by the Goa Police during a protest at Azad Maidan in Panaji, where they allegedly shouted slogans against the Union Government, State Government, and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The High Court had earlier ordered their release on Sunday, noting that the detention may not have been authorised under the law.
Everything you need to know about this case, in one place.
The Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court heard a plea challenging the detention of seven members of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). The individuals were detained by the Goa Police during a protest at Azad Maidan in Panaji, where they allegedly shouted slogans against the Union Government, State Government, and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The High Court had earlier ordered their release on Sunday, noting that the detention may not have been authorised under the law.
In its defense, the Goa Police filed an affidavit justifying the action, citing a history of unauthorized protests by the outfit, alleged past violations, and claims that the group patronized Umar Khalid. The police denied using force or dragging protesters, stating that individuals were detained under Section 172(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) because they lacked permission to protest. The High Court took the affidavits on record and adjourned the hearing.
Separately, the Delhi High Court questioned the Delhi Police regarding the alleged confinement of an activist who filed a plea against a blanket ban on protests around Jantar Mantar and the New Delhi district. The petitioner alleged he was confined by police officers at a headquarters to prevent him from joining a peaceful protest, while the police maintained he was only stopped and not detained. Both matters involving protests and police actions remain pending before the respective courts.
Not yet reported: The articles do not report the final court judgments or whether compensation or disciplinary inquiries sought by the petitioners were granted.
The latest position in the reports we read.
The petitions challenging the detentions and restrictions remain pending before the Bombay High Court and the Delhi High Court, with no final judicial orders issued yet.
Described in general terms; we do not name victims.
The affected individuals include seven CJP members detained in Panaji, Goa, during a protest, and an activist in Delhi who alleged preventive confinement by police officers.
Key dates as reported, oldest first.
The method described in the reports.
Tell your local police, or dial 112 in an emergency. Please do not investigate or confront anyone yourself. You can also share a tip anonymously with us.
More cases like this one.
Optional. The full story is above; these are the original reports it was prepared from.
Prepared by Report Scams, with the help of AI, from the published reports listed above. Check those reports for the latest. Cases here describe allegations. An FIR, arrest or charge is not a finding of guilt. To report a mistake, or to ask for a correction or removal, write to our Grievance Officer. See also the Safe Posting policy.