🇮🇳 India's first community scam intelligence platform — search before you trust⚡ UPI Fraud? File a report in 60 seconds and protect others📞 Cybercrime Helpline 1930 — free, 24×7, available across all states🛡️ Your report is anonymous — speak up, keep India safe🏛️ Know your rights — explore Citizen Ethics from birth to death🔍 86,420 cybercrime cases were registered in India in 2023 (NCRB)🇮🇳 India's cybercrime cases are nearly 9× higher than in 2014 (NCRB)🇮🇳 3,82,632 cybercrime cases registered in India from 2014 to 2023 (NCRB, via MHA)📞 ₹7,130 crore+ saved in 23.02 lakh+ cyber-fraud complaints through India's helpline system (I4C, MHA)🇮🇳 India's first community scam intelligence platform — search before you trust⚡ UPI Fraud? File a report in 60 seconds and protect others📞 Cybercrime Helpline 1930 — free, 24×7, available across all states🛡️ Your report is anonymous — speak up, keep India safe🏛️ Know your rights — explore Citizen Ethics from birth to death🔍 86,420 cybercrime cases were registered in India in 2023 (NCRB)🇮🇳 India's cybercrime cases are nearly 9× higher than in 2014 (NCRB)🇮🇳 3,82,632 cybercrime cases registered in India from 2014 to 2023 (NCRB, via MHA)📞 ₹7,130 crore+ saved in 23.02 lakh+ cyber-fraud complaints through India's helpline system (I4C, MHA)

Report Scams

For a Better India

Updating protected services for a safer Bharat. Jai Hind.

Bombay HC calls Arun Ferreira’s 2011 arrest illegal…

← Back to crime reports

activeTerror & SecurityMaharashtra

Bombay HC calls Arun Ferreira’s 2011 arrest illegal, orders Rs 2 lakh compensation

The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench declared the September 2011 arrest of activist Arun Ferreira to be illegal, ruling that the state police violated his fundamental rights under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution. The court directed the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 2 lakh in compensation to the activist.

State

Maharashtra

First reported

October 2026

Compensation ordered

Rs 2 lakh

Court

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench

Agency involved

Maharashtra State Police

Date of disputed arrest

September 2011

Status

Court ordered compensation to be deposited within eight weeks

The full story

Everything you need to know about this case, in one place.

According to the petition, the activist was released from prison on September 27, 2011, after being acquitted in eight criminal cases. As he stepped outside, officers in plain clothes reportedly picked him up in an unnumbered vehicle while his family and lawyers were waiting to receive him.

The police defended the action by claiming secrecy was necessary due to alleged Naxal links and argued that he was absconding, despite having been in prison since 2007. The bench rejected this justification, noting the failure to communicate the grounds of arrest to the individual or his waiting family members.

The court ordered the state government to deposit the compensation amount within eight weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek a different remedy if dissatisfied. The petitioner is also an accused in the 2018 Bhima Koregaon case and remains out on bail.

Not yet reported: The articles do not mention whether the individual plans to seek a higher compensation amount through another court.

Where the case stands

The latest position in the reports we read.

The Bombay High Court has declared the 2011 arrest illegal, ordered the state to pay Rs 2 lakh in compensation within eight weeks, and noted that the petitioner can approach an appropriate court if dissatisfied with the amount.

Who was affected

Described in general terms; we do not name victims.

An activist and his family members who were present outside the prison during his release in 2011.

Timeline

Key dates as reported, oldest first.

2007The activist was imprisoned prior to subsequent acquittals.

September 27, 2011The activist was released from prison after acquittal in eight criminal cases and was immediately re-arrested by police.

2018The activist became an accused in the Bhima Koregaon case.

October 2026The Bombay High Court ruled the 2011 arrest illegal and ordered compensation.

How the scam worked

The method described in the reports.

Police officers in plain clothes waited outside a prison where the petitioner was being released following acquittals.
Upon release, officers intercepted and picked up the individual in an unnumbered vehicle.
Authorities failed to communicate the grounds or reasons for the arrest to the individual or to the family members and advocates present at the scene.
The state police subsequently described the individual as absconding despite records showing ongoing imprisonment since 2007.

Know something about this case?

Tell your local police, or dial 112 in an emergency. Please do not investigate or confront anyone yourself. You can also share a tip anonymously with us.

Call 112 Anonymous tips

Keep reading

More cases like this one.

Email bomb threats spark panic at five courts in MaharashtraTerror & Security · Maharashtra Don't Waste Money, Celebs Must Do Anti-Fireworks Campaign For Free: Bombay High CourtTerror & Security · Maharashtra Mumbai Police detains 25, including comedian Masoom Rajwani, over candle march for IIT Bombay suicide victimTerror & Security · Maharashtra Actor Imran Khan to move Bombay HC against order to leave IndiaTerror & Security · Maharashtra

Sources and further reading

Optional. The full story is above; these are the original reports it was prepared from.

newindianexpress.comOriginal report The New Indian Expressnewindianexpress.com Bombay High Court Declares Activist’s Arrest Illegal, Orders Maharashtra Government To Pay ₹2 Lakh Compensation For Violation Of Arrest Safeguards – The Legal Affair - The Legal AffairThe Legal Affair · 31 Oct 2026

Prepared by Report Scams, with the help of AI, from the published reports listed above. Check those reports for the latest. Cases here describe allegations. An FIR, arrest or charge is not a finding of guilt. To report a mistake, or to ask for a correction or removal, write to our Grievance Officer. See also the Safe Posting policy.