Fundamental Rights
Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.
This article protects specific laws that Parliament has listed in the Constitution's "Ninth Schedule" from being challenged as violating Fundamental Rights, no matter what. The Ninth Schedule was created as a safe list for land reform and other laws that Parliament wanted shielded from judicial review on rights grounds. Importantly, the Supreme Court later held (in I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2007) that Ninth Schedule laws passed after 24 April 1973 can still be reviewed if they damage the Constitution's "basic structure" - so this protection is not absolute for more recent laws.
A state Land Reforms Act placed in the Ninth Schedule generally cannot be struck down by a court solely for conflicting with Article 14 or 19 - though if it was enacted after April 1973 and a court finds it damages the Constitution's basic structure, it can still be reviewed and struck down on that separate ground.