Services
(1) A civil servant can only be dismissed/removed by an authority at least as senior as the one that appointed them. (2) They cannot be dismissed/removed/reduced in rank without a proper inquiry where they're informed of the charges and given a reasonable opportunity to be heard - except where they've already been convicted on a criminal charge, where holding an inquiry isn't reasonably practicable (recorded in writing), or where the President/Governor decides an inquiry isn't expedient for state security reasons. (3) The dismissing authority's own decision on whether an inquiry was practicable is final.
This is the crucial DUE PROCESS counterweight to Article 310's "doctrine of pleasure" - government employees have real, constitutionally-guaranteed protection against arbitrary dismissal: they must generally get a fair inquiry with a chance to respond to specific charges before losing their job or being demoted, with only narrow, specific exceptions.
This is why a government employee facing serious disciplinary action is entitled to a formal departmental inquiry - being told the specific charges and given a genuine chance to respond - before being dismissed, except in the narrow exceptional circumstances (criminal conviction, impracticality, or security reasons) this article specifically allows.