Finance, Property, Contracts
Where a court/Commission's expenses, or someone's pension, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India (or a State's) but actually serve/served another state's or the Union's separate needs, an agreed (or arbitrator-determined) contribution must be charged to and paid from the other relevant Consolidated Fund instead.
This is a fair cost-allocation mechanism: if a body funded by one government's Consolidated Fund is actually serving another government's needs (or a person's pension reflects service to a different government than the one paying it), the government that actually benefited must contribute its fair share, rather than one government bearing costs that properly belong to another.
If a court funded by the Union's Consolidated Fund also serves some of a particular state's specific judicial needs, that state would be expected to contribute its fair share toward the court's expenses, rather than the Union bearing the full cost alone.